Hastie shares that concern. Lately, he mentioned, Queen’s Park’s promoting level is as a hub for youth improvement: It attracts gamers not by providing to pay them, however by offering the “finest amenities, one of the best teaching” exterior Celtic and Rangers. The trail laid down by Liverpool’s Robertson is part of that lure — “everybody right here needs to put on the No. three shirt” in his honor, Hastie mentioned — however so, too, is the chance to name Hampden residence.
Leaving, then, delivers a double blow: Queen’s Park’s eight youth groups are based mostly at Lesser Hampden, and it’s not totally clear when or the place they may play if that facility is remade to deal with the primary group. That — along with the lack of the distinctive probability to play each different week on the nationwide stadium — might undo a lot of Queen’s Park’s good work.
What worries them most, although, is one thing much less tangible. To those that have spent their lives following Queen’s Park, or working for Queen’s Park, Hampden is a central a part of the membership’s identification. This spot has been its residence for 115 years. It has been its proprietor, its developer, its protector. At occasions, as Hastie mentioned, it has felt like an “unlucky custodian.”
They know that the time has come to promote, to downsize. However a number of the membership’s members hoped, maybe, to be allowed to stay as tenants, as visitors of the S.F.A. They concern that by transferring on utterly, Queen’s Park is abandoning a little bit of its soul, a little bit of itself, within the bricks and mortar and empty seats of Hampden Park.
“Queen’s and Hampden are intrinsically linked,” Hastie mentioned. “It’s our complete historical past, our cause for being. If we lose Hampden, we lose our standing as a nationwide establishment. We lose all the things.”