Matt Kallman, an Uber spokesman, stated Monday that Uber was “shifting in a brand new path.” Over the previous yr, he stated, the corporate has modified the way it compensates and evaluates workers, revealed range reviews and educated workers on range and management. He didn’t immediately tackle any of Ms. Avendaño’s claims, saying Uber wouldn’t touch upon pending litigation.
Ms. Avendaño’s claims of sexual harassment and a human assets division uninterested or unwilling to curb the issue is paying homage to points raised by Susan Fowler, one other former Uber engineer, who introduced intense scrutiny to the corporate when she revealed a weblog publish about her time at Uber.
Ms. Fowler stated that when she reported her direct supervisor for sexually harassing her, administration instructed her that it wouldn’t really feel comfy punishing him as a result of he was a excessive performer and that it was most likely an harmless mistake. After her publish, the corporate employed Eric H. Holder Jr., the previous legal professional normal, and his legislation agency, Covington & Burling, to analyze the claims and assess its office. Uber fired 20 workers for sexual harassment and different office misconduct primarily based on the report’s findings.
The lawsuit raises questions on Uber’s human assets division, which is led by Liane Hornsey, who joined Uber in 2017, and whether or not it has carried out sufficient to halt hostile working circumstances for girls on the firm. After the Holder report, Uber took the weird step of bringing on one other legislation agency, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, to analyze sure complaints about human assets.
Uber’s Mr. Kallman stated the corporate took such complaints critically and labored with exterior legislation corporations to “make sure the independence of the investigation.”
Ms. Avendaño stated that when she discovered from co-workers that the corporate had determined to not punish the person who sexually harassed Ms. Fowler, she knowledgeable her bosses and human assets that that they had mishandled the state of affairs and have been making a hostile office. She even reported her standpoint to Thuan Pham, Uber’s chief expertise officer, she stated.
She stated she was reprimanded for throwing senior officers “beneath the bus,” as a result of she took the matter on to Mr. Pham. She stated her bosses retaliated by denying her pay will increase and profession development, prompting human assets to inform her shortly earlier than she left the corporate in June that her wage was “abnormally low.”